Share Your Feedback on Sangfor Checks and Win 2500 Coins!
  

Sangfor Jojo Lv5Posted 24 Sep 2024 15:58



Dear forum family,
We're excited to announce an opportunity for you to share your usage experiences, evaluations, and suggestions regarding our Sangfor Checks tool!
Your insights are invaluable to us as we strive to enhance the tool’s effectiveness and usability.


How to Participate:                                                                     

Download the tool
Download the step-by-step guideline
Share your feedback with report screenshot by replying to this post.


Incentives Rules:                                                                        

1. Sharing only your health inspections result will be rewarded with 200 coins. You can earn up to 1000 coins for different devices' reports.


2. Sharing your health inspection result with feedback like "usability, functionality and suggestion for improvements" will be rewarded with 500 coins. You can earn up to 2500 coins for sharing different devices' reports.


Warm Tips:

1. If you have inspected more than one device, you can share up to 5 times.
2. Sharing screenshots of duplicate devices will not be rewarded.
3. The screenshot must show the device ID, and no reward will be given if the screenshot is not updated even after reminding.



Possible Feedback to Share:                                                      

1). Usability
Tell us about your experience navigating the tool. "Were there any aspects that you found confusing or particularly user-friendly?"

2). Functionality
We’d love to know how well the features work for you. "Are there any tools you find especially helpful, or any that you rarely use?"

3). Performance
"Did you notice any slowdowns or issues during use? Let us know your experience!"

4). Documentation and Support
"Was the user manual clear and helpful? Did you find the support resources adequate when you needed assistance?"

5). Suggestions for Improvement
"What additional features would you like to see in Sangfor Checks? Any existing features you think could be enhanced?"

6). Overall Experience
"How satisfied are you with your overall experience using the tool? Would you recommend it to others? Please share your reasons!"

Here we provide a specific feedback example based on the above templates to make you better understand.
Documentation and Support
Example: The user manual is clear and well-organized, but I struggled to find troubleshooting steps for specific issues. Including a dedicated FAQ section would be beneficial.


Your voice matters, and we can’t wait to hear from you.
Together, let’s make the Health Check Tool even better!

Invitation Template (1).docx

269.65 KB, Downloads: 23

Sangfor Checks_V5.0.4_User Manual_Reviewed_20241019.pdf

2.88 MB, Downloads: 23

Zonger Lv5Posted 11 Nov 2024 00:48
  
When using ACheck to perform a task on your customer's HCI three-cluster nodes, I suggest noting that if you use a super admin user other than the default "admin," you may encounter permission errors around 10% of the time during the task. It would be beneficial to have a feature, similar to the ES appliance check, that allows you to verify the connection before initiating the task. This would help prevent running the task with incorrect credentials.
JJ Teoh Lv1Posted 30 Oct 2024 15:40
  
SANGFOR Checks is a very useful and user-friendly application. Even I'm an intern and new to it, I still manage to use it, the layout is very clear and tidy, and the guide is good. It will auto run all of the health check and provide a full report which is very clear in providing the health check details.

Screenshot 2024-10-29 141738.png (500.53 KB, Downloads: 19)

Screenshot 2024-10-29 141738.png
Imran Tahir Lv4Posted 09 Oct 2024 15:35
  
NGAF Report enlcosed with this


rohmattullah Lv1Posted 07 Oct 2024 16:37
  
I'm late joining this event..
can't wait to get an email from sangfor
Rendy Rinaldy Lv1Posted 02 Oct 2024 14:40
  
I applied this to see the health of the HCI system

Functionally it is very helpful to identify which areas need to be followed up, but it is necessary to add the severity level whether it is high, low, or critical.
I still need to learn more about the recommendations issued.

for documentation and support I think it is more effective to provide direct links to more detailed documents.

Overall, the tool seems user-friendly and functional. The health score is a nice feature for providing an at-a-glance overview of system health.

sangfor check.jpg (135.6 KB, Downloads: 33)

sangfor check.jpg
Imran Tahir Lv4Posted 02 Oct 2024 00:29
  
Here is the health check report. Sangfor Checks is a nice and useful tool.



Enrico Vanzetto Lv4Posted 26 Sep 2024 19:59
  

Suggestion for Improvement:

On the report, we see that on mouse hover, some details about score appeared.
On this case it would be nice if there's some advice than the patch missing (for example a quick release notes instead):

Enrico Vanzetto Lv4Posted 26 Sep 2024 19:51
  
Suggestion for Improvement:

Also, i suggest you to make task progress more readable as when we are out of office when performing maintenance on our clients, usually we are working with laptops (FHD resolution at least). It would be nice that the progression details and steps are always visible.
On this case i have to keep scrolling to see if the task remain stuck.


Also at the end of the task it would be nice if there's an option to export the task log to investigate further if there's any issue.
Enrico Vanzetto Lv4Posted 26 Sep 2024 19:46
  
Suggestion for Improvement:

HI, about perform single task on acheck to check our customer's HCI three cluster nodes (latest 6.10), i suggest you to specify on the tool that if you use another user (with super admin privilegies) than admin, at 10% about of the task you get an  error about permission.
It would be nice that, like es appliance check, there's a button to try connection before starting the task (to avoid starting task with wrong credentials for example).
Enrico Vanzetto Lv4Posted 25 Sep 2024 17:02
  
HI, when i perform single task on acheck to check our ES appliance (6.0.4EN), on the guide it's mention to set port 22345.
On Es appliance, the suggested ssh port is 33345.
Anyway, when we enable ssh port on Es appliance, it seems that nothing changed as even on telnet, the appliance didn't answer on the port we choose for ssh connection. Is there any other setting to made on Es appliance to permit ssh connection?

Trending Topics

Board Leaders